Editorial Policy
Reviewed by
Steven P., FAAD
Board-certified dermatologist
Updated on
Reviewed for accuracy
Table of Contents
Our mission
Telogen effluvium can be confusing and stressful. Our goal is to publish clear, accurate, and practical guidance that helps you understand hair shedding, identify likely triggers, and discuss options with a qualified clinician.
Our standards at a glance
Claims must be supported by reputable clinical sources. We avoid exaggeration and avoid certainty where evidence is mixed.
We use simple language, define medical terms, and focus on what’s most useful for decision-making.
We highlight risks, contraindications, and when to see a clinician. We do not promote unsafe “quick fixes.”
We disclose medical review, editorial roles, and any monetization (ads or affiliate links) when used.
Who creates our content
Editorial team
Editors ensure content is easy to understand, logically structured, and aligned with our sourcing and update standards. Editors also enforce our rules on tone, claims, and disclosures.
Medical reviewers
When appropriate, medically oriented content is reviewed by a licensed clinician (such as a board-certified dermatologist or other qualified medical professional) to validate clinical accuracy, safety notes, and appropriate wording of claims.
How we create and review content
Medical review focuses on clinical correctness and safe framing. It does not mean a page is personalized medical care.
- Checks that medical statements match reputable references
- Ensures risk and “see a clinician” guidance is appropriate
- Confirms wording avoids certainty where evidence is limited
- Flags missing context (timeline, differential diagnoses, red flags)
Some pages may be Editorially Reviewed only (for example, general education or glossary pages), and will clearly indicate the review type on-page.
Evidence and sources
We prioritize reputable, clinically oriented sources, including peer-reviewed studies, medical textbooks, and guidance from recognized medical organizations. When evidence is limited or evolving, we say so.
- Prefer systematic reviews, randomized trials, clinical guidelines, and high-quality observational studies
- Avoid over-relying on single studies, especially small or low-quality studies
- Use primary sources when possible (not just summaries)
- Clearly separate evidence from opinion or anecdote
We include a references section on applicable pages so readers can verify key claims.
Product mentions, recommendations, and claims
If we discuss ingredients, routines, or products, we aim to be practical and realistic. We do not claim that any product “cures” telogen effluvium. We describe what evidence suggests may help, for whom, and what risks to consider.
If affiliate links or ads are used
Some pages may include monetized links (affiliate) or advertising. If so, we disclose it on the page. Monetization does not change our editorial standards, sourcing requirements, or conclusions.
- We do not accept payment in exchange for positive coverage
- We do not allow sponsors to edit our content
- We disclose material relationships when present
Conflicts of interest
We aim to avoid conflicts that could bias content. When a potential conflict exists (financial, professional, or personal), we disclose it and apply additional editorial scrutiny.
Corrections and feedback
If you spot a mistake, unclear wording, or an outdated claim, tell us. We review credible reports and correct verified errors promptly. For meaningful corrections, we update the page and refresh the “Last updated” date.
Contact us via the site contact page. Include the URL, the specific statement you’re flagging, and (if possible) a supporting source.
How we keep content updated
Telogen effluvium information can change as research evolves. We periodically review priority pages, especially those covering diagnosis, lab work, medications, and safety considerations.
We refresh lists as evidence grows (stress, illness, medications, nutrition, postpartum, and more).
We update shedding and regrowth timing language to reflect the best available clinical consensus.
We revisit risks, contraindications, and who should avoid certain approaches.
Privacy and user safety
We do not provide personal diagnosis in articles. If you share information with us through forms or messages, please avoid including sensitive medical details unless necessary. See our site policies for more.
FAQs
Does “Medically Reviewed” mean the page is medical advice?
No. It means a qualified clinician reviewed the content for clinical accuracy and safe framing. It is still educational and not a substitute for personalized care.
How do you choose sources?
We prioritize peer-reviewed studies, clinical guidelines, and reputable medical references. We avoid over-relying on low-quality or single-source claims.
Do ads or affiliate links influence what you publish?
No. Monetization (when used) is disclosed and does not change our standards, sourcing, or conclusions. Sponsors do not edit our work.
How often is content updated?
High-impact pages are reviewed periodically and updated as evidence, guidance, or safety considerations change. The “Last updated” date reflects the most recent meaningful revision.
Reviewed by
Steven P., FAAD
Board-certified dermatologist
Updated on
Reviewed for accuracy
